Scotland went out of the World Cup in heartbreaking fashion but in the cold light of day what did we take from a tournament that left them with encouraging signs

By Rory Baldwin

Don’t Blame the Referee

Reading the emotive views of fans this week, Scottish fans either feel peripheral to Tier One teams and the victims of endless conspiracies emanating from World Rugby HQ designed to keep the elite teams rolling, whilst south of the equator it seems the Scots are in fact getting all the decisions because they are part of the controlling elite conspiring at World Rugby HQ. It’s all very confusing.

I don’t like to grumble about referees as I believe that the best teams make their own luck – by fair means or foul. Scotland rode their luck a fair bit with Bernard Foley missing most of his conversions, some scrum calls that could have gone the other way, and of course, three fortuitous tries.

I’m a little uneasy that World Rugby have opened up their review to publicly admit Craig Joubert was in the wrong and should have awarded a scrum to Australia instead of the final penalty. Given the ease with which they scored through the phases through the previous 78 minutes, there’s nothing to say the Wallabies wouldn’t have scored again in the remaining two from the set scrum so “we was robbed” is not quite the right attitude to adopt.

Craig Joubert, the referee, sprints off the pitch after the final whistle during match between Australia and Scotland. Photo

Don’t blame the ref: Craig Joubert, sprints off the pitch after the final whistle during

It is a shame that Scotland were on the wrong end of several dubious decisions once again (the Ross Ford/Jonny Gray bans, Sean Maitland’s yellow card, Drew Mitchell’s late hit on Stuart Hogg), and it is a minor disgrace that the referee left the pitch without shaking hands with at least either captain.

But it’s also a shame that the pack did not pick a safer lineout call in the rain when all Scotland needed was to retain possession for two more minutes and claim a place in Scottish Rugby history.

Attack Attack Attack

Pete Horne’s stroll through the Australian ruck defence will give (Australian defence coach) Nathan Grey kittens, but is a further example of the sort of heads-up awareness that needs to be a foundation of Scottish play going forward.

Scotland looked so much better on Sunday when they were playing to their strengths and getting the big players carrying the ball, punching holes with a fast-paced offloading game, varying the point of attack and trying to get in behind their opponents. This suits the players and brings territory and possession which in turn cough up kickable penalties and opportunities for quick counter attacking tries. It might leave Scotland teams open to counter-attacks in turn, but that’s better than sitting off and letting heavier opponents batter them about.

Fast-paced offloading game: David Denton of Scotland offloads as he is tackled by Bernard Foley.

Fast-paced offloading: David Denton of Scotland offloads as he is tackled by Bernard Foley

This should of course be tempered by the realisation that all of Scotland’s tries against Australia (and at least one against Samoa) were opportunist and they were not as effective at going through the phases to score simple tries as the top teams are.

At least there is a blueprint, and Scotland are increasingly sticking to it.

Still Things to Sort Out

Let’s not get too carried away though.

There are still glaring holes in the Scottish skillset, the two most obvious being dealing with restarts and driving mauls. Vern Cotter will be plotting how to resolve this before Scotland are battered with lineout drives come February.

Without control of the restart, any team can hand back momentum to the opposition instantly after a score, and Scotland have long been guilty of this. Only the TMO spared their blushes on Sunday when an Australian try following a fluffed restart was knocked off for a knock on.

Project Players Don’t Look So Bad Now

Laidlaw’s kicking and game management were generally very good but after him and a resurgent Richie Gray, WP Nel and John Hardie were arguably the two players of the tournament for Scotland. Alongside his Edinburgh mucker Al Dickinson and Ross Ford, Nel bested pretty much every loosehead prop put in front of him and the Scottish scrum was restored to a weapon rather than an embarrassment.

Hardie and Blair Cowan, while never reaching the heights of say Michael Hooper and David Pocock, at least delivered an effective response at the breakdown and in Hardie, Scotland have found a player with a prodigious workrate who will only improve as he settles in at his new club Edinburgh.

Prodigious workrate: Scotland's John Hardie

Prodigious workrate: Scotland’s John Hardie

This World Cup Was Still A Success

An appearance in the quarter-finals was really the minimum expected of Scotland, but at the same time, for many it was the maximum expected too. No one really gave them a chance against Australia, who were overall favourites in many eyes coming in to the tournament, and remained so – at least until the All Black giant awoke against France on Saturday night.

So to run them closer than England and Wales had, and in fact come two minutes away from knocking them out of the tournament, must be viewed as the best possible outcome short of winning the game.

Gordon Reid of Scotland and Mark Bennett applaud the fans following their team's quarter-final defeat. Photo: Getty images

Exceeding expectations: Gordon Reid and Mark Bennett applaud the fans following their team’s quarter-final defeat. Photo: Getty images

This team now know that they can compete with the very best, which will give them heart for a 2016 Six Nations that should be something of a healing process for Northern Hemisphere rugby.

If they can learn enough from this World Cup to start creating their own luck, Scotland should be competing to win it, not fighting to avoid the Wooden Spoon.

  • StBedeofBerwick

    Now that rugby is in the Olympics, residency rules will have to correlate with IOC. As for the rest about players with Grandparents, Scotland will always do well here as so many have travelled abroad to find work and new lives elsewhere.

  • John M

    I am sick to death of lazy journalism on the topic of qualification to play for a country. Let me say in advance, I absolutely do not agree with a three year residency period and wish that it was far longer. World Rugby are right to look at this area – if they don’t, the dangers to the integrity of international rugby are all too apparent.

    Why is it that the debate on qualification always ends up centring on two countries, Scotkand and New Zealand? Scotland are accused of taking anyone they can find (usually from NZ) and New Zealand of pillaging the South Sea Islands (when almost all the players they select were actually born in NZ and have dual qualification possibilities).

    Firstly, a “project player” is one brought in by a country, to fill a potential gap, who has no previous bloodline connection with the country in question. John Hardie is not a project player. Scotland had three such players in their squad – Nel, Visser and Strauss, only one of which started against Australia.

    How many players did others have, who only qualify through residency? In their respective squads Ireland and NZ also had three each, Wales had five, whereas Australia and France had a grand total of nine each! How come Australia and France never get criticised or belittled for their residency based players?

    As for everyone new favourite team, Japan had ten such players…..not quite such a great triumph for a huge nation that’s played rugby for years when looked at it that way, is it?

    One final thing….the only country with a player qualified by residency in this World Cup? Argentina.