World Rugby have sanctioned the South African director of rugby after a misconduct hearing on his behaviour towards match officials during the Lions tour
Rassie Erasmus
during the Autumn Nations Series (Getty Images)
Rassie Erasmus behaviour during Lions series earn ban from rugby for two months
World Rugby have banned Springboks director of rugby Rassie Erasmus from all rugby activities for two months, after ruling that his behaviour towards match officials during the recent British & Irish Lions 2021 series constituted misconduct.
Erasmus is also banned from taking part in match days until October 2022, including coaching, contact with match officials and media engagement.
The 49-year-old produced an extensive video in July following South Africa’s first Test loss to the Lions. According to World Rugby the video contained “premediated, multiple abusive and insulting comments and attacks on the officials’ integrity”.
Shortly after the verdict, SARU released a statement saying: “Both parties confirmed they will exercise their rights to appeal the verdicts.”
Nugget No1 of Erasmus verdict – WR received an application from a TV production company to broadcast the hearing
An independent misconduct committee chaired by Christopher Quinlan QC, together with Nigel Hampton QC and Judge Mike Mika (both New Zealand) ruled that SA Rugby should pay a fine of £20,000, while they and Erasmus were handed a warning for future conduct and informed that each should send an apology to the relevant match officials.
Erasmus emailed Berry day after first Test to say: “…we feel the pressure which the lions attempted to put on your team of 4 through media did actually work well for them!! While we will be doing the same this week I think you will note that ours is more factual and honest!!”
World Rugby stated: “Having considered all the evidence, including oral evidence from the match officials, Rassie Erasmus, SA Rugby, World Rugby, and submissions from the parties the committee found all six charges against Mr Erasmus proved.”
Nugget No2 of Erasmus hearing: Jaco Peyper disputed parts of Nic Berry's key evidence
1: threatened a match official that unless a requested meeting took place he would publish footage containing clips criticising the match official’s performance and then making good on that threat.
2: attacked, disparaged and/or denigrated the game and officials.
3: did not accept or observe the authority and decisions of match officials
4: published or caused to be published criticism of the manner in which a match official handled a match.
5: engaged in conduct or activity that may impair public confidence in the integrity and good character of match official(s).
6: brought the game into disrepute when he published or caused to be published the Erasmus Video.
And RFU v Richard Cockerill in 2009, “this bloke is f***ing s**t” “you are all a bunch of useless c***s” and “I’m going to slag this c**t off to every f***ing newspaper going, you watch me”